Skip to content
  • News & Events
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • English - United States
  • English - Canada
EN/US
Logo
  • Solutions
    • Solutions
    • eDiscovery
      • Early Case Assessment
      • Processing
      • Web Hosting
      • Data Analysis
      • Consulting
      • Expert Witness & Technical Consulting
      • Multi-Language Litigation
      • eDiscovery for Government Agencies
    • Document Review
    • Digital Forensics
      • Evidence Collection & Preservation
      • Forensic Expert Services
      • Data Forensic Process
      • Accredited Lab & Facilities
    • Court Reporting Services
    • Record Retrieval & Subpoena Services
      CA & TX
    • Traditional Services
      • Locations
    • Contract Legal Staffing & Legal Recruiting
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Array In-House Solutions
      • Acumen
    • Strategic Partnerships
  • Experience
    • Experience
    • Our Team
    • Company Timeline
    • Testimonials
  • Insights
  • Solutions
    • Solutions
    • eDiscovery
      • Early Case Assessment
      • Processing
      • Web Hosting
      • Data Analysis
      • Consulting
      • Expert Witness & Technical Consulting
      • Multi-Language Litigation
      • eDiscovery for Government Agencies
    • Document Review
    • Digital Forensics
      • Evidence Collection & Preservation
      • Forensic Expert Services
      • Data Forensic Process
      • Accredited Lab & Facilities
    • Court Reporting Services
    • Record Retrieval & Subpoena Services
      CA & TX
    • Traditional Services
      • Locations
    • Contract Legal Staffing & Legal Recruiting
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Array In-House Solutions
      • Acumen
    • Strategic Partnerships
  • Experience
    • Experience
    • Our Team
    • Company Timeline
    • Testimonials
  • Insights
    • English - United States
    • English - Canada
    EN/US
  • News & Events
  • Careers
  • Contact

Get Started

  • English - United States
  • English - Canada
EN/US
Get Started

Insights Articles

  • Insights
  • Articles
Services

This Week in eDiscovery: Privilege Log Falls Short on Key Entries

| June 26, 2025

Every week, the Array team reviews the latest news and analysis about the evolving field of eDiscovery to bring you the topics and trends you need to know. This week’s post covers the period of June 15-21. Here’s what’s happening.

On the EDRM Blog, Michael Berman writes about a Florida federal court ruling in Gilbane Bldg. Co. v. School Bd. of Broward County that a defendant’s privilege log was partially inadequate—making decisions across six critical areas regarding privilege assertions.

What happened?

In this case, the plaintiff challenged several aspects of the defendant’s privilege log. The court then evaluated six discrete issues:

  • Email addresses – The court denied the plaintiff’s demand that the defendant’s privilege log include email addresses for senders and recipients listed on the log. The court stated there’s no requirement to include sender/recipient addresses and, more importantly, the plaintiff offered no legal argument to support its request.
  • Role of email participants – This request, for the privilege log to identify the relationship between senders/recipients and the parties, was granted in part. The court required the defendant, within seven days, to identify only individuals whose roles can’t be easily determined by the plaintiff.
  • Email chains vs. separate entries – While the plaintiff wanted the defendant to log each email message separately, the court ruled it is permissible for the defendants to log email chains as single entries only if the subject matter is consistent and descriptions are first improved upon.
  • Provide date of “imminent” litigation – This point was moot: The court found the defendant had already provided this information.
  • Subject-line descriptions – Defendant provided the exact subject line of each privileged email, but the court agreed with the plaintiff that the subject line descriptions alone were too vague (“RE: Stranahan High School - Division 15 Balance”) and required more detailed entries to assess confidential legal content.
  • In-camera review – The court declined to consider an in-camera review until a compliant log was submitted and parties had conferred.
Why the ruling matters
  • Privilege logs must meaningfully inform. Simply listing sender/recipient names or subject lines isn’t enough—logs must enable the receiving party and the court to assess the basis for the claimed privilege.
  • Targeted detail is required, not blanket omissions. Identifying key roles, breaking out chains appropriately, and enhancing descriptions ensures transparency and reduces needless disputes.
  • Courts won’t do your work. In-camera review isn’t a shortcut; parties must first attempt to meet standards collaboratively before seeking judicial intervention.
Takeaways for legal teams
  • Audit your logs now: Check entries for vague descriptions, missing roles, or overbroad chains.
  • Plan for iteration: Be ready to adjust logs after meet-and-confer discussions; proactive correction avoids motion practice and delays.
  • Consider technology assistance: Generative AI tools are now being used to assist case teams with identifying privilege and creating first-pass privilege log descriptions; consider using advanced technology to help augment the human review for these types of documents.

Other recent eDiscovery news and headlines:

  • Chambers Guidance: Using AI Large Language Models (LLMs) Wisely and Ethically (Craig Ball)
  • Failure to Submit Jackson Affidavits Among Reasons for Sanctions: eDiscovery Case Law (eDiscovery Today)

Julia Helmer; Director, Client Solutions

With 15 years of expertise, Julia excels at optimizing enterprise eDiscovery workflows from start to finish. With a deep understanding of how to seamlessly integrate workflows across various eDiscovery platforms, Julia creates tailored solutions for data identification, legal holds, ESI collections, and productions. By harnessing the power of Technology Assisted Review and Analytics, she delivers efficient, cost-effective results that align with best practices and budgetary constraints. Julia’s exceptional communication and customer service skills have fostered strong, lasting relationships with both clients and Project Management teams, enabling her to effectively problem-solve and drive success across numerous projects.

Share this post

Keep reading

 How the EDRM Really Works (And Why It Still Matters)
eDiscovery

How the EDRM Really Works (And Why It Still Matters)

Oct 14, 2025 8:00:00 AM

 This Week in eDiscovery: Court Agrees with Challenge on Privilege Log Entries for Email Attachments
eDiscovery

This Week in eDiscovery: Court Agrees with Challenge on Privilege Log Entries for Email Attachments

Sep 29, 2025 3:15:11 PM

 Array Acquires Celerity Discovery, Strengthening its eDiscovery and Litigation Support Capabilities
News

Array Acquires Celerity Discovery, Strengthening its eDiscovery and Litigation Support Capabilities

Sep 22, 2025 8:30:00 AM

 This Week in eDiscovery: ILTA’s Technology Survey + Sedona Working Group on AI Data
eDiscovery

This Week in eDiscovery: ILTA’s Technology Survey + Sedona Working Group on AI Data

Sep 19, 2025 1:06:16 PM

Frame 35

People.
Process.
Excellence.

Lets Talk
  • QUICK LINKS
  • Solutions
  • Technology
  • Experience
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • News & Events

Stay Current. Stay Competitive. Stay Informed.

SOC 2
Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Report Abuse
All Rights Reserved. ©2025 Array Trust Array