Skip to content
  • News & Events
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • English - United States
  • English - Canada
EN/US
Logo
  • Solutions
    • Solutions
    • eDiscovery
      • Early Case Assessment
      • Processing
      • Web Hosting
      • Consulting
    • Document Review
    • Court Reporting Services
    • Record Retrieval & Subpoena Services
      CA & TX
    • Traditional Services
      • Locations
    • Contract Legal Staffing & Legal Recruiting
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Array In-House Solutions
      • Acumen
    • Strategic Partnerships
  • Experience
    • Experience
    • Our Team
    • Company Timeline
    • Testimonials
  • Insights
  • Solutions
    • Solutions
    • eDiscovery
      • Early Case Assessment
      • Processing
      • Web Hosting
      • Consulting
    • Document Review
    • Court Reporting Services
    • Record Retrieval & Subpoena Services
      CA & TX
    • Traditional Services
      • Locations
    • Contract Legal Staffing & Legal Recruiting
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Array In-House Solutions
      • Acumen
    • Strategic Partnerships
  • Experience
    • Experience
    • Our Team
    • Company Timeline
    • Testimonials
  • Insights
    • English - United States
    • English - Canada
    EN/US
  • News & Events
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • News & Events
  • Careers
  • Contact

Get Started

  • English - United States
  • English - Canada
EN/US

Get Started

Insights Articles

  • Insights
  • Articles
Services

This Week in eDiscovery: Objections to Court-Decided ESI Protocol Fall Apart

| June 6, 2025

Every week, the Array team reviews the latest news and analysis about the evolving field of eDiscovery to bring you the topics and trends you need to know. This week’s post covers the period of May 25-31. Here’s what’s happening.

On eDiscovery Today, Doug Austin writes about Hall v. Warren, a class action in the Western District of New York alleging excessive force and failure to address misconduct by a city police department. The magistrate judge directed both parties to meet and develop a proposed ESI protocol, and if the parties weren’t able to agree, they must submit separate proposals for the judge to decide which portions would become the approved ESI order.

The magistrate judge’s alternate scenario played out, and the defendants objected to the court-drafted ESI order, filing a motion that the ESI order must be vacated because of errors. A district judge overruled the objections, affirming the magistrate judge’s ESI order. Austin summarizes the case opinion to illustrate why the motion failed.

  • The court found good cause to require the production of metadata: “Plaintiffs argue that workflow history and metadata from the use of force reports, civilian complaints, and internal investigation files are critical to their claims of excessive force and failure to supervise and discipline.”
  • The court considered circumstances that the burden of production would outweigh the value: “the parties will meet and confer to agree on a reasonable alternative if the protocol in the order creates an undue burden.”
  • The court rejected a defense argument that it failed to consider the extraordinary cost of compliance: “As the City Defendants acknowledged, Local Rule 26(e)(6), allows the Court to ‘apportion the costs of discovery or presentation of ESI, including discovery of ESI that is not reasonably accessible, upon a showing of good cause, or unequal burdens, or unreasonable request.’ Thus, the language of Local Rule 26(e)(6) allows the court to apportion ESI discovery costs in limited circumstances, even absent an agreement between the parties.”
  • Other arguments: The city argued the court failed to consider they do not have the technical ability to Bates stamp or redact items produced in native format to comply with the ESI order, however the court responded that the ESI order “does not require Bates stamping of native files” In addition, the defendants argued the court erred again by ordering production to be compatible with Relativity, the plaintiff’s ESI program. The court rejected this argument too, stating: “the ESI Order is not inflexible… if compatibility with Relativity is an undue burden, then the ESI Order provides a mechanism by which the City Defendants can seek an alternative form of production.”

The takeaway here is that parties are encouraged as much as possible to collaborate and together on a mutually-agreeable ESI protocol. Even if each side has to give a little to take a little, the protocol emerging from a meet-and-confer will likely be a better outcome than one unilaterally imposed by the court.

Other recent eDiscovery news and headlines:

  • Court Reminds That Proportionality Is Central to Modern Discovery (New York Law Journal)
  • Judicial Approaches to Acknowledged and Unacknowledged AI-Generated Evidence (Science and Technology Law Review)

Julia Helmer; Director, Client Solutions

With 15 years of expertise, Julia excels at optimizing enterprise eDiscovery workflows from start to finish. With a deep understanding of how to seamlessly integrate workflows across various eDiscovery platforms, Julia creates tailored solutions for data identification, legal holds, ESI collections, and productions. By harnessing the power of Technology Assisted Review and Analytics, she delivers efficient, cost-effective results that align with best practices and budgetary constraints. Julia’s exceptional communication and customer service skills have fostered strong, lasting relationships with both clients and Project Management teams, enabling her to effectively problem-solve and drive success across numerous projects.

Share this post

Keep reading

eDiscovery

Do You Need an eDiscovery Consultant? Here’s When It Matters

Aug 28, 2025 2:28:55 AM

eDiscovery

What Really Happens During eDiscovery Processing?

Aug 28, 2025 2:27:10 AM

eDiscovery

What Is eDiscovery? A Practical Guide for Legal Teams

Aug 28, 2025 12:32:16 AM

Cut Through the Digital Clutter: Why eDiscovery Is No Longer Optional In today’s legal environment,...

 Change Doesn’t Have to Be Scary: Why I Love What Most People Dread
Services

Change Doesn’t Have to Be Scary: Why I Love What Most People Dread

Jul 22, 2025 11:07:46 AM

Change is hard. It’s hard in life, and it’s especially hard at work—particularly when it feels...

Frame 35

People.
Process.
Excellence.

Lets Talk
  • QUICK LINKS
  • Solutions
  • Technology
  • Experience
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • News & Events

Stay Current. Stay Competitive. Stay Informed.

SOC 2
Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Report Abuse
All Rights Reserved. ©2025 Array Trust Array