Skip to content
  • News & Events
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • English - United States
  • English - Canada
EN/US
Logo
  • Solutions
    • Solutions
    • eDiscovery
      • Early Case Assessment
      • Processing
      • Web Hosting
      • Data Analysis
      • Consulting
      • Expert Witness & Technical Consulting
      • Multi-Language Litigation
      • eDiscovery for Government Agencies
    • Document Review
      • Incident Response Review
    • Digital Forensics
      • Evidence Collection & Preservation
      • Forensic Expert Services
      • Data Forensic Process
      • Accredited Lab & Facilities
    • Court Reporting Services
    • Record Retrieval & Subpoena Services
      CA & TX
    • Traditional Services
      • Locations
    • Contract Legal Staffing & Legal Recruiting
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Array In-House Solutions
      • Platform Intelligence
      • Review Intelligence
      • Testimony Intelligence
      • Acumen
    • Strategic Partnerships
  • Experience
    • Experience
    • Our Team
    • Company Timeline
    • Testimonials
  • Insights
  • Solutions
    • Solutions
    • eDiscovery
      • Early Case Assessment
      • Processing
      • Web Hosting
      • Data Analysis
      • Consulting
      • Expert Witness & Technical Consulting
      • Multi-Language Litigation
      • eDiscovery for Government Agencies
    • Document Review
      • Incident Response Review
    • Digital Forensics
      • Evidence Collection & Preservation
      • Forensic Expert Services
      • Data Forensic Process
      • Accredited Lab & Facilities
    • Court Reporting Services
    • Record Retrieval & Subpoena Services
      CA & TX
    • Traditional Services
      • Locations
    • Contract Legal Staffing & Legal Recruiting
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Array In-House Solutions
      • Platform Intelligence
      • Review Intelligence
      • Testimony Intelligence
      • Acumen
    • Strategic Partnerships
  • Experience
    • Experience
    • Our Team
    • Company Timeline
    • Testimonials
  • Insights
    • English - United States
    • English - Canada
    EN/US
  • News & Events
  • Careers
  • Contact

Get Started

  • English - United States
  • English - Canada
EN/US
Get Started

Insights Articles

  • Insights
  • Articles
Services

How Array Uses AI in Records Retrieval: Efficiency and Privacy are Key

| August 24, 2023

When legal teams take on complex litigation, they often outsource the records retrieval process for efficiency reasons. Less time and money spent on preparing subpoenas, tracking down requests, and scanning documents means more time to review your case and work on a winning strategy.

With budgets tightening, law firms and in-house teams expect records retrieval providers to be efficient as well. And with ChatGPT and artificial intelligence making headlines seemingly hourly, lawyers might wonder if records retrieval could just be assigned to an algorithm. In fact, some providers are offering fully-AI powered solutions in records retrieval.

At Array, we’re interested in AI as well, but we operate from a standpoint of data protection first and foremost. Large Language Models (LLMs) can ingest and analyze enormous amounts of data, but that data isn’t always secure in the hands of the AI. Array’s Records Retrieval team deals with loads of personal information, whether it's healthcare or financial information, and we take that responsibility seriously.

Records retrieval is also about time. There are standards of time for requesting records and clients have expectations for when services will be rendered. So while Array is interested in how AI can help increase efficiency, we’re not interested in full automation and replacing experienced professionals who take care to retrieve records timely and securely.

How Array balances AI, efficiency, and privacy

When Array started to explore how AI could cut down the amount of time it takes for our professionals to complete tasks, we focused on applying the technology to relatively benign information, public knowledge such as business addresses, for example, that could enhance the services provided by our team, not eliminate them. Array has very clear boundaries in our Subpoena Division for what is viable, and what is not viable for non-human interaction.

The solution: Array is using AI for verification purposes, which cuts down the time it takes records professionals to verify locations where records are located before documents are served. After our team uses AI for a first pass, which is significantly faster than a human first pass, we check the computer’s work and make sure nothing is missing. The result is time saved for our team and for our clients.

Why we’re cautious about AI

When LLMs like ChatGPT, Google Bard and Bing AI became popular this year, users raced to try them — without appreciating the potential privacy risks.

When you submit a question or feed data to these AIs for analysis, there’s a chance those tools are storing your queries, including any sensitive information you upload, and using it to improve their models.

That might not seem like a big deal if you’re asking the AI to write a toast for your friend’s wedding. But records retrieval is exponentially more sensitive.

The companies behind the AIs give you some control of your data privacy. But Samsung reportedly had some of its trade secrets compromised when it fed company data into ChatGPT.

In spring 2023, OpenAI unveiled an easier “opt out” security option that lets ChatGPT users disable their chat history so that it can’t be used to train the AI’s models. OpenAI technically holds onto the logs for 30 days and says it will only review them if it’s investigating reports of abuse.

Bing has launched an enterprise model, Bing Chat Enterprise, which won’t save user data, send it to Microsoft or use it to refine Bing’s model. (The original Bing Chat does collect search data, though users can delete their search and chat history.)

Google Bard gives users the ability to prevent it from saving your Bard activity and to delete older activity, though there are loopholes: “Even when Bard Activity is off, your conversations will be saved with your account for up to 72 hours to allow us to provide the service and process any feedback.” Still, Google cautions Bard users not to include information that could identify themselves or others.

Where we’re headed

Like all technology, AI is evolving. While Array is currently testing the AI waters for efficiency opportunities that don’t conflict with our privacy standards, we are monitoring and researching ways LLMs can increase the value of the records services we provide.

Share this post

Keep reading

 The AI & Legal Tech Forecast 2026: What’s Working Now—And What’s Next
eDiscovery

The AI & Legal Tech Forecast 2026: What’s Working Now—And What’s Next

Mar 6, 2026 9:08:15 AM

This week, Array and Relativity brought together experts across product, client solutions, business...

 Array Introduces “Array Intelligence,” a Unified AI-Driven Technology Suite Powering Modern Litigation
News

Array Introduces “Array Intelligence,” a Unified AI-Driven Technology Suite Powering Modern Litigation

Mar 3, 2026 6:30:00 AM

The launch formalizes Array’s propriety innovations and strengthens its position as a...

 Relativity Server’s Road to 2027: FAQs
eDiscovery

Relativity Server’s Road to 2027: FAQs

Feb 24, 2026 9:00:36 AM

Relativity recently clarified its long-term roadmap for Relativity Server. Beginning December 31,...

 Where AI Helps—and Where It Doesn’t—in Legal Review
eDiscovery

Where AI Helps—and Where It Doesn’t—in Legal Review

Feb 20, 2026 9:00:00 AM

Summary: AI can accelerate legal review by handling repetitive, high-volume tasks and ensuring...

Frame 35

People.
Process.
Excellence.

Lets Talk
  • QUICK LINKS
  • Solutions
  • Technology
  • Experience
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • News & Events

Stay Current. Stay Competitive. Stay Informed.

SOC 2
Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Report Abuse
All Rights Reserved. ©2025 Array Trust Array