The Three Most Common Reasons eDiscovery Costs Spiral
1. Underestimating Data Volume (and Variety)
Today’s legal matters involve more than just emails and PDFs. Think chat messages, Slack and Teams channels, collaborative documents, cloud archives, mobile devices, and even social media content., The universe of ESI (electronically stored information) continues to expand – and with it, the challenge of managing it effectively.
When teams underestimate the sheer volume and variety of data at the outset of a case, the downstream impact is significant. Too often, collection efforts are overly broad, pulling in unnecessary data that then needs to be processed and reviewed. That means more irrelevant files in the review set, more time wasted, and more costs passed along.
It’s important to remember: every gigabyte matters. Each additional gigabyte drives hosting costs, processing costs, and review costs. What may feel like “just a little extra” quickly turns into real budget creep. By clearly defining the data landscape upfront, legal teams can take a more targeted, defensible, and cost-conscious approach ensuring they're focused on the data that actually matters.
2. Lack of eDiscovery Price Transparency
One of the biggest frustrations legal teams face is that not all providers price services the same way. While some offer predictable pricing models or tiered structures, others charge for every gigabyte, user, or project milestone – often without clearly outlining how costs accumulate. And without proactive reporting or cost projections, it is easy for budgets to get blindsided by unexpected charges. What starts as a manageable project can quickly balloon into an invoice no one saw coming.
That is why transparency matters. Clear communication about how costs are structured is essential. Legal teams deserve eDiscovery price transparency from their partners – before discovery begins, not after the invoice is delivered.
3. Inefficient or Manual Review Processes
Document Review is where costs can really start to add up quickly – often 70% of total spend. It’s not always because of the documents themselves, but how the review is managed. If documents aren’t prioritized effectively, workflows aren’t clear or the right technology isn’t in place, review hours can balloon quickly.
Even experienced review teams can lose time if the review platform isn’t configured properly or if the appropriate quality control checks are missing. Without smart batching, analytics, or automation, what could be a streamlined process turns into a costly time sink.